CO129-196 - Public Offices & Others - 1881 — Page 89

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

ture

any

in circulation.

86

should be confirmed by

an Ordinance of Singapore)

In explanation of these suggested

clauses

of

an amending Ordinance, My Lords need only

remark that they have omitted the power reserved

to the Governor of Hong Kong in the Ordinance

of

1866 to alter the denomination of the notes,

further that

and

of

They

have

suggested the replacing

the provision for the marshalling the assets of the

Company at the end of Section 12 of the Ordinance

of 1866, by the more efficient provision for the same

purpose introduced after much consideration into

the Imperial Banking Act of 1879 (42/43 Vic. c. 76).

In this instance also My Lords think that

the first step should be the amendment of the

original Ordinance establishing the Bank, and if

the Secretary of State should then think it better

that the establishment of the Bank in Singapore

should

9706/30

Jov

6317 Shails

T-80

an Ordinance following generally the original Ordinance of Hong Kong might be passed in the Straits Settlement, but in the meantime My Lords

do not advise that the Draft Ordinance of the

Straits enclosed in the Secretary of

State's letter

27 May 1880 should be passed.

It might be a

preferable course to repeal

altogether the Ordinance of 1866, and pass

one incorporating the new provisions.

o

new,

I have the honour to be,

Your

obedient

Servant;

RtWilly

a new

REIGN

ome

7ar

of

Edit History

2026-05-22 20:19:56 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
ture any in circulation. 86 should be confirmed by an Ordinance of Singapore) In explanation of these suggested clauses of an amending Ordinance, My Lords need only remark that they have omitted the power reserved to the Governor of Hong Kong in the Ordinance of 1866 to alter the denomination of the notes, further that and of They have suggested the replacing the provision for the marshalling the assets of the Company at the end of Section 12 of the Ordinance of 1866, by the more efficient provision for the same purpose introduced after much consideration into the Imperial Banking Act of 1879 (42/43 Vic. c. 76). In this instance also My Lords think that the first step should be the amendment of the original Ordinance establishing the Bank, and if the Secretary of State should then think it better that the establishment of the Bank in Singapore should 9706/30 Jov 6317 Shails T-80 an Ordinance following generally the original Ordinance of Hong Kong might be passed in the Straits Settlement, but in the meantime My Lords do not advise that the Draft Ordinance of the Straits enclosed in the Secretary of State's letter 27 May 1880 should be passed. It might be a preferable course to repeal altogether the Ordinance of 1866, and pass one incorporating the new provisions. o new, I have the honour to be, Your obedient Servant; RtWilly a new REIGN ome 7ar of
Baseline (Original)
ture any in circulation. 86 should be confirmed by an Ordinance of Singapore) In explanation of these suggcoted clauses of p an amending Ordinance, My Lords need only remark that they have omitted the power reserved to the Governor of Hong Kong in the Ordinance of 1866 to alter the denomination of the noted, further that. and of They have suggested the replacing the provision for the marshalling the assets of the Company at the end of Section 12 of the Ordinance f 1866, by the more efficient provision for the sanie purpose introduced after much consideration into the Imperial Banking Act of 1879 (42/43 Vic. c. 76). In this instance also My Lords think that the first step should be the amendment of the original Ordinance establishing the Bank, and if : the Secretary of Shrite should then think it better thee: the establishment of the Bank in Singapore should 9706/30 Jov 6317 Shails T-80 an Ordinance following generally the original D Ordinance of Hong Kong might be passed in the Straits Settlement, but in the meantime My Lords do not advise that the Druft Ordinance of the State's letter Straits enclosed in the Secretary of 27 May 1880 should be passed. It might be a preferable course to repeal altogether the Ordinance of 18106, and pass one incorporating the new provisions. o new, I have the honour to be, Your obedient Jervant; RtWilly a new REIGN ome 7ar of
2026-05-22 20:19:56 · Baseline
View content

ture

any

in circulation.

86

should be confirmed by

an Ordinance of Singapore)

In explanation of these suggcoted

clauses

of

p

an amending Ordinance, My Lords need only

remark that they have omitted the power reserved

to the Governor of Hong Kong in the Ordinance

of

1866 to alter the denomination of the noted,

further that.

and

of

They

have

suggested the replacing

the provision for the marshalling the assets of the

Company at the end of Section 12 of the Ordinance

f 1866, by the more efficient provision for the sanie

purpose introduced after much consideration into

the Imperial Banking Act of 1879 (42/43 Vic. c. 76).

In this instance also My Lords think that

the first step should be the amendment of the

original Ordinance establishing the Bank, and if

: the Secretary of Shrite should then think it better

thee: the establishment of the Bank in Singapore

should

9706/30

Jov

6317 Shails

T-80

an Ordinance following generally the original D Ordinance of Hong Kong might be passed in the Straits Settlement, but in the meantime My Lords

do not advise that the Druft Ordinance of the

State's letter

Straits enclosed in the Secretary of

27 May 1880 should be passed.

It might be a

preferable course to repeal

altogether the Ordinance of 18106, and pass

one incorporating the new provisions.

o

new,

I have the honour to be,

Your

obedient

Jervant;

RtWilly

a new

REIGN

ome

7ar

of

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.